Fixed-Duration versus Continuous Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.
Summary
Fixed-Duration versus Continuous Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Original Article Abstract Background Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) currently consists of two main approaches - continuous therapy with Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors and fixed-duration regimens combining venetoclax with either CD20 antibodies or Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Comparisons of these two therapeutic approaches are lacking. Methods We conducted an investigator-initiated, p
Content
# Fixed-Duration versus Continuous Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.
*Original Article*
# Abstract
## Background
Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) currently consists
of two main approaches - continuous therapy with Bruton's tyrosine kinase
inhibitors and fixed-duration regimens combining venetoclax with either CD20
antibodies or Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Comparisons of these two
therapeutic approaches are lacking.
## Methods
We conducted an investigator-initiated, phase 3, randomized trial
involving patients with previously untreated CLL. Patients were randomly
assigned to receive continuous ibrutinib or fixed-duration
venetoclax-obinutuzumab or venetoclax-ibrutinib. The primary end point was
investigator-assessed progression-free survival (noninferiority margin for the
hazard ratio, 1.608, corresponding to a noninferiority margin of 8 percentage
points at 3 years). Secondary end points included minimal residual disease
(MRD), response, overall survival, and safety.
## Results
A total of 909 patients were assigned to venetoclax-obinutuzumab (303
patients), venetoclax-ibrutinib (305 patients), or ibrutinib (301 patients). The
median follow-up was 34.2 months. In this prespecified interim analysis, 3-year
progression-free survival was 81.1% in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group, 79.4%
in the venetoclax-ibrutinib group, and 81.0% in the ibrutinib group (hazard
ratio for venetoclax-obinutuzumab vs. ibrutinib, 0.87 [98.3% confidence interval
{CI}, 0.54 to 1.41]; hazard ratio for venetoclax-ibrutinib vs. ibrutinib, 0.84
[98.0% CI, 0.53 to 1.32]); the results for each comparison met the criterion for
noninferiority. After the end of treatment, MRD in peripheral blood was
undetectable in 73.3% of the patients in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group,
47.2% in the venetoclax-ibrutinib group, and 0% in the ibrutinib group.
Three-year overall survival was 91.5%, 96.0%, and 95.7%, respectively. The most
common adverse events were infections, gastrointestinal disorders, and
cytopenias.
## Conclusions
In patients with previously untreated CLL, fixed-duration treatment
with venetoclax-obinutuzumab or venetoclax-ibrutinib was noninferior to
continuous ibrutinib with regard to investigator-assessed progression-free
survival. (Funded by the University of Cologne and others; CLL17
ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04608318; EudraCT number, 2019-003854-99.).
---
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2515458