Prehospital Whole Blood in Traumatic Hemorrhage - a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Summary
Prehospital Whole Blood in Traumatic Hemorrhage - a Randomized Controlled Trial. Original Article Abstract Background Whole-blood transfusion has recently gained favor in the management of severe hemorrhage; however, data from large clinical trials evaluating its clinical effectiveness and safety are lacking. Methods We conducted a pragmatic, phase 3, multicenter, unblinded, randomized, superiority trial across 10 air ambulance services in England. Patients with major traumatic hemorrha
Content
# Prehospital Whole Blood in Traumatic Hemorrhage - a Randomized Controlled Trial.
*Original Article*
# Abstract
## Background
Whole-blood transfusion has recently gained favor in the management
of severe hemorrhage; however, data from large clinical trials evaluating its
clinical effectiveness and safety are lacking.
## Methods
We conducted a pragmatic, phase 3, multicenter, unblinded, randomized,
superiority trial across 10 air ambulance services in England. Patients with
major traumatic hemorrhage who were attended by a participating air ambulance
service were randomly assigned to receive either whole-blood transfusion (up to
2 units) or standard care with blood components (up to 2 units each of red cells
and plasma) before arrival at the hospital. The primary outcome was a composite
of death from any cause or massive transfusion (ā„10 units of blood components or
products) within 24 hours after randomization.
## Results
A total of 942 patients underwent randomization. After the exclusion of
participants with nontraumatic hemorrhage or traumatic cardiac arrest, 616 were
included in the analysis (314 in the whole-blood group and 302 in the
standard-care group). A primary-outcome event occurred in 48.7% of the
participants in the whole-blood group and in 47.7% of those in the standard-care
group (relative risk, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 1.31; Pā=ā0.84).
The incidence of death from any cause at all time points, massive transfusion,
and other secondary outcomes appeared to be similar in the two groups.
Prothrombin times were above the normal range in 40.7% of the participants in
the whole-blood group and in 30.5% of those in the standard-care group. More
serious adverse events occurred in the standard-care group than in the
whole-blood group (37 and 31, respectively). The incidence of thrombotic events
appeared to be similar in the two groups.
## Conclusions
Among participants with life-threatening hemorrhage, prehospital
transfusion of 2 units of whole blood was not superior to standard care in
reducing the risk of death or massive transfusion within 24 hours. (Funded by
NHS Blood and Transplant and others; ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN23657907.).
---
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2516043