Azithromycin for Preschoolers with Wheezing in the Emergency Department.
Summary
Online ahead of print. Original Article Abstract Background Wheezing illnesses are a leading cause of hospitalization for preschool-age children and are frequently treated with antibiotics. Observational studies have shown more frequent isolation of three pathogenic bacteria (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Haemophilus influenzae) from nasopharyngeal samples from children with recurrent episodes of wheezing than from those without such illnesses. Methods In this mu
Content
# Online ahead of print.
*Original Article*
# Abstract
## Background
Wheezing illnesses are a leading cause of hospitalization for
preschool-age children and are frequently treated with antibiotics.
Observational studies have shown more frequent isolation of three pathogenic
bacteria (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Haemophilus
influenzae) from nasopharyngeal samples from children with recurrent episodes of
wheezing than from those without such illnesses.
## Methods
In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned patients 18 to 59
months of age who presented to an emergency department with a moderate-to-severe
episode of wheezing to receive azithromycin once daily at a dose of 12 mg per
kilogram of body weight or matching placebo for 5 days. The primary outcome was
the sum of scores on the Asthma Flare-up Diary for Young Children (ADYC) over 5
days. Primary-outcome scores could range from 5 to 35, with higher scores
indicating more severe wheezing-related symptoms. Efficacy was assessed
separately in patients who tested positive for pathogenic bacteria (the positive
cohort) and in those who tested negative (the negative cohort). Secondary
outcomes were length of stay in the emergency department, length of hospital
stay, and return emergency department visits or hospitalizations within 72
hours. Bacterial clearance and antimicrobial resistance were measured at
follow-up visits 1 to 3 weeks after randomization.
## Results
Among 840 patients who underwent randomization, 521 tested positive for
pathogenic bacteria. The trial was stopped for futility by the data and safety
monitoring board after a planned interim analysis. ADYC scores did not differ
significantly between the azithromycin and placebo groups in either the positive
cohort (median, 9.59 [interquartile range, 7.29 to 12.60] vs. 9.72
[interquartile range, 7.66 to 12.17]; Pā=ā0.70) or the negative cohort (median,
9.30 [interquartile range, 6.97 to 11.62] vs. 9.10 [interquartile range, 7.19 to
11.45]; Pā=ā0.69). In the positive cohort, bacterial clearance was 58.7% in the
azithromycin group and 11.4% in the placebo group. Secondary outcomes appeared
to be similar in the two groups for both cohorts, as did the development of
bacterial resistance and the incidence of adverse events.
## Conclusions
Azithromycin did not lead to a greater reduction in the severity of
wheezing-related symptoms than placebo in preschool-age children who presented
to the emergency department with moderate-to-severe acute wheezing. (Funded by
the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; AZ-SWED
ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04669288.).
---
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2516505