Lay community health worker-led care with mobile decision support for uncontrolled hypertension: a cluster-randomized trial
Summary
Access to hypertension care remains insufficient, particularly in remote rural areas in resource-limited settings. Community health workers (CHWs), lay providers living in the communities they serve, may help close this gap, but the effectiveness and safety of lay CHW-led hypertension care-including independent initiation and titration of medication-remain uncertain. We conducted a 1:1 cluster-randomized trial nested within the Community-Based Chronic Care Lesotho (ComBaCaL) cohort study i
Content
# Lay community health worker-led care with mobile decision support for uncontrolled hypertension: a cluster-randomized trial
*Published: 2026 Mar*
Access to hypertension care remains insufficient, particularly in remote rural
areas in resource-limited settings. Community health workers (CHWs), lay
providers living in the communities they serve, may help close this gap, but the
effectiveness and safety of lay CHW-led hypertension care-including independent
initiation and titration of medication-remain uncertain. We conducted a 1:1
cluster-randomized trial nested within the Community-Based Chronic Care Lesotho
(ComBaCaL) cohort study in 103 rural villages in Lesotho. Following
community-based hypertension screening, 547 nonpregnant adults with blood
pressure (BP) ≥140/90 mm Hg were enrolled (274 control and 273 intervention). In
intervention clusters, lay CHWs independently prescribed and titrated a
fixed-dose combination of amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide, guided by a mobile
clinical decision support system. In control clusters, participants were
referred to health facilities for standard care. The primary objective was to
assess the effectiveness and safety of lay CHW-led care, with the primary
outcome defined as BP <140/90 mm Hg at 12 months. In the intention-to-treat
analysis (543 participants with 4 exclusions owing to intercurrent pregnancy),
BP control was achieved by 156/271 (58%) versus 130/272 (48%) in intervention
and control arms, respectively (adjusted odds ratio 1.52, 95% confidence
interval 1.01 to 2.29, P = 0.046). A predefined complete case analysis yielded
consistent results. No relevant differences in safety outcomes were observed.
Among people with uncontrolled hypertension, lay CHW-led, CDSS-supported care
was safe and more effective than referral to facility-based professional care.
These findings support expanding first-line hypertension management by lay CHWs
in remote, resource-limited settings. Clinicaltrials.gov registration:
NCT05684055 .
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-026-04208-w