Global burden of cancer in children and adolescents aged 0-19 years, 1990-2023:
Summary
Global burden of cancer in children and adolescents aged 0–19 years, 1990–2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023 The Lancet 2026 Articles Global burden of cancer in children and adolescents aged 0–19 years, 1990–2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023 GBD 2023 Childhood Cancer Collaborators Summary Lancet 2026; 407: 1360–73 Background Information on childhood cancer burden is crucial for eective cancer policy planning. Unfortunate
Content
# Global burden of cancer in children and adolescents aged 0–19 years, 1990–2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023
*The Lancet 2026*
Articles
Global burden of cancer in children and adolescents aged
0–19 years, 1990–2023: a systematic analysis for the Global
Burden of Disease Study 2023
GBD 2023 Childhood Cancer Collaborators*
Summary
Lancet 2026; 407: 1360–73 Background Information on childhood cancer burden is crucial for eective cancer policy planning. Unfortunately,
See Comment page 1306 observed paediatric cancer data are not available in every country, and previous global burden estimates have not
discretely reported several common cancers of childhood. We aimed to inform eorts to address childhood cancer
*Collaborators listed at the end
of the Article burden globally by analysing results from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2023,
Correspondence to: which now include nine additional cancer causes compared with previous GBD analyses.
Dr Lisa M Force, Institute for
Health Metrics and Evaluation, Methods GBD 2023 data sources for cancer estimation included population-based cancer registries, vital registration
University of Washington,
systems, and verbal autopsies. For childhood cancers (defined as those occurring at ages 0–19 years), mortality was
Seattle, WA 98195, USA
lforce@uw.edu estimated using cancer-specific ensemble models and incidence was estimated using mortality estimates and modelled
or mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs). Years of life lost (YLLs) were estimated by multiplying age-specific cancer deaths
Dr Nickhill Bhakta, St Jude by the standard life expectancy at the age of death. Prevalence was estimated using survival estimates modelled from
Children’s Research Hospital, MIRs and multiplied by sequelae-specific disability weights to estimate years lived with disability (YLDs). Disability-
Memphis, TN 38105, USA adjusted life-years (DALYs) were estimated as the sum of YLLs and YLDs. Estimates are presented globally and by
nickhill.bhakta@stjude.org
geographical and resource groupings, and all estimates are presented with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs).
Findings Globally, in 2023, there were an estimated 377 000 incident childhood cancer cases (95% UI 288 000–489 000),
144 000 deaths (131 000–162 000), and 11·7 million (10·7–13·2) DALYs due to childhood cancer. Deaths due to
childhood cancer decreased by 27·0% (15·5–36·1) globally, from 197 000 (173 000–218 000) in 1990, but increased in
the WHO African region by 55·6% (25·5–92·4), from 31 500 (24 900–38 500) to 49 000 (42 600–58 200) between
1990 and 2023. In 2023, age-standardised YLLs due to childhood cancer were inversely correlated with country-level
Socio-demographic Index. Childhood cancer was the eighth-leading cause of childhood deaths and the ninth-leading
cause of DALYs among all cancers in 2023. The percentage of DALYs due to uncategorised childhood cancers was
reduced from 26·5% (26·5–26·5) in GBD 2017 to 10·5% (8·1–13·1) with the addition of the nine new cancer causes.
Target cancers for the WHO Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer (GICC) comprised 47·3% (42·2–52·0) of global
childhood cancer deaths in 2023.
Interpretation Global childhood cancer burden remains a substantial contributor to global childhood disease and
cancer burden and is disproportionately weighted towards resource-limited settings. The estimation of additional
cancer types relevant in childhood provides a step towards alignment with WHO GICC targets. Eorts to decrease
global childhood cancer burden should focus on addressing the inequities in burden worldwide and support
comprehensive improvements along the childhood cancer diagnosis and care continuum.
Funding St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Gates Foundation, and St Baldrick’s Foundation.
Copyright © 2026 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar
technologies.
Introduction preventable deaths associated with childhood cancer,
Children diagnosed with cancer in high-income countries WHO initiated the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer
(HICs) are estimated to have a 5-year overall survival that (GICC)4 at the UN General Assembly in 2018, with the
exceeds 80%.1,2 Unfortunately, these positive outcomes goal of improving childhood cancer outcomes and
have not translated globally, with 5-year net survival reducing suering due to childhood cancer globally.
estimated to be less than 20% for children who develop To eectively address childhood cancer globally, it is
cancer in some low-income and middle-income countries crucial to understand the burden of childhood cancers at
(LMICs).3 Factors contributing to the inequity in outcomes the global, regional, national, and community levels.
include multilevel challenges such as access to timely However, disease surveillance systems that record and
diagnosis, resource-optimised treatments, and supportive report cancer burden data, such as population-based
care. In recognition of the major disparities and cancer registries and vital registration systems, are not
1360
Articles
Research in context
Evidence before this study complete understanding of childhood cancer burden on global,
We searched PubMed for English-language articles estimating regional, and national scales and are steps towards the ability to
global childhood cancer burden and published between track progress towards WHO GICC targets globally. In addition,
Jan 1, 2010, and Oct 15, 2023, using the terms “childhood or this is the first GBD analysis of changes in global childhood
child or pediatric” and “cancer or malignancy or tumor or cancer burden over time, presenting estimates from 1990 to
neoplasm or oncology” and “global or international or world or 2023. Our analysis suggests that the WHO GICC target cancer
worldwide” and “burden or incidence or mortality or survival or types comprised approximately half of childhood cancer deaths
prevalence or DALYs”. We identified separate studies that globally in 2023, with variation by world region. While the total
presented global estimates of select measures of childhood number of childhood cancer deaths globally decreased between
cancer burden, including incidence, mortality, and survival, 1990 and 2023, it increased in the WHO African region, and
each focused on estimates for one calendar year. Analyses of premature loss of life due to childhood cancer was greatest in
childhood cancer burden estimates from previous rounds of the countries with the least resources in 2023. Childhood cancer
Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study was in the top ten causes of childhood death globally in 2023,
(GBD) have been published, which incorporate multiple and when compared with adult cancers, was the second-leading
measures including incidence, mortality, prevalence, years of cause of cancer DALY burden in countries with a low Socio-
life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life- demographic Index in 2023.
years (DALYs). Each of the aforementioned publications
Implications of all the available evidence
presented important aspects of childhood cancer burden, but
Childhood cancers contribute substantial burden within global
no previous publication analysed global childhood cancer
child health and global oncology. In countries with the least
burden estimates inclusive of index cancers identified for
resources, children with cancer still suffer the greatest
monitoring progress of the WHO Global Initiative for Childhood
premature mortality, highlighting that while progress has been
Cancer (GICC) across multiple measures and time.
made in outcomes globally over the past several decades,
Added value of this study disparities remain. The WHO GICC is a crucial collaborative
To our knowledge, GBD 2021 was the first study to capacity building and implementation strategy that has
comprehensively and separately quantify the global burden of fundamentally changed the landscape of childhood cancer since
several cancer types which are relevant in childhood and it was established in 2018. The target cancers identified for
adolescence, and our analysis of GBD 2023 results is the first monitoring of progress in the WHO GICC comprise a sizeable
formal GBD analysis of these additional cancer types in the child portion of childhood cancer burden globally, but a considerable
and adolescent age group. These cancer types include portion of childhood cancer burden is not part of the identified
retinoblastoma, neuroblastoma, Burkitt lymphoma, soft tissue targets, and this is greater in some world regions than others.
sarcomas, bone cancers, and hepatoblastoma, and their These findings reflect the need for WHO GICC efforts to address
addition to GBD allows for comparisons to other cancer types strengthening of health systems and childhood cancer needs
and diseases estimated with cohesive methodology and across and priorities as a whole in order to implement equitable and
time. Estimates of these cancer types will contribute to a more sustainable improvements in childhood cancer outcomes.
available everywhere in the world, and there is a estimates of the global burden of childhood cancers
particular dearth of reliable data in LMICs.5,6 Previous presented results using multiple measures with a focus on
studies have analysed the international burden of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), a measure that
childhood cancer with a focus on incidence,7 incidence incorporates both the morbidity and premature mortality
and mortality,8 and survival9 where data are available. of a disease.11 However, with the advent of the WHO GICC
Model-based estimates of the global burden of childhood a year later, monitoring gaps remained. In particular,
cancer, which aim to provide estimates where data do incidence, mortality, and DALY estimates for only three of
not exist as well as estimates at a global level, have been the six index GICC childhood cancers were available in the
produced for incidence,10 incidence and mortality,11,12 and GBD 2017 analysis. Additionally, only approximately
survival.3,13 73·5% of childhood cancer DALYs were categorised in the
The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk previous analysis, as important childhood cancer types
Factors Study (GBD)14 generates global estimates for were not separately reported in the GBD 2017 cause list.
diseases, including cancers, across time and incorporates In this analysis, we aimed to summarise the updated
improvements in each iteration, oering a sustainable estimates of global childhood cancer burden in 2023 and
framework for childhood cancer burden estimation. These across time from 1990 to 2023. These results present, for
estimates support crucial cancer control work worldwide the first time in a formal GBD analysis of childhood and
while ongoing eorts to expand cancer surveillance adolescent cancer burden, an additional nine new cancer
systems continue.15,16 A previous analysis of GBD 2017 causes, representing closer alignment with the six GICC
Articles
index cancers. In aggregate, these results add important vital registration system mortality data to increase the
health policy data to support health delivery considerations. data available for retinoblastoma (appendix 1 pp 56–58).
This manuscript was produced as part of the GBD Cancer cause-specific mortality estimates generated
Collaborator Network and in accordance with the GBD using CODEm were scaled to independently modelled
Protocol.17 all-cause mortality to produce final cancer mortality
estimates. Years of life lost (YLLs) were estimated by
Methods multiplying the number of cancer-specific deaths in a
Overview given age group by the standard life expectancy at the age
GBD provides a framework for estimating global disease of death. To evaluate the relationship between age-
burden and aims to produce comprehensive and standardised YLLs and Socio-demographic Index (SDI),
comparable measures of disease burden across geography we fitted a linear regression model and calculated the
and time. GBD is updated at regular intervals, with each Pearson correlation.
round incorporating new data, improving methods, and Non-fatal cancer estimation begins by transforming
generating updated estimates for all included locations, final cancer mortality estimates to incidence estimates by
age groups, sexes, and years. Updated GBD estimates thus dividing the mortality estimates by their corresponding
supersede the estimates of previous rounds. We present MIRs.21 Prevalence across 10 years was modelled using
estimates produced by the most recent round, incidence estimates and modelled survival based on
GBD 2023,14,18,19 in this analysis. Details on GBD 2023 data MIRs, then divided into phases of cancer care to estimate
For GBD 2023 data sources see sources are available on the Global Health Data Exchange years lived with disability (YLDs). Phases of cancer care
https://ghdx.healthdata.org/ (GHDx) website for GBD 2023. The study is compliant diered for cohorts based on whether they were
gbd-2023/sources with the GATHER statement.20 GBD used de-identified estimated to survive or not. For the cohort surviving for
data, and the waiver of informed consent was reviewed 10 years after their cancer diagnosis, two phases were
and approved by the University of Washington Institutional estimated: (1) diagnosis and treatment and (2) remission.
Review Board (study number 9060). For the cohort not surviving for 10 years after their cancer
diagnosis, four phases were estimated: (1) diagnosis and
Cancer estimation in GBD treatment, (2) remission, (3) metastatic or disseminated,
Data sources for cancer estimation in GBD include and (4) terminal. The prevalence of each phase was
population-based cancer registries, vital registration multiplied by a phase-specific disability weight to
See Online for appendix 1 systems, and verbal autopsy data (appendix 1 pp 22–51; generate YLD estimates. Disability weights are meant to
maps of site-years of cancer data available in GBD 2023 represent the magnitude of health loss associated with
See Online for appendix 2 are available in appendix 2 pp 2–4).21 Cancer mortality health outcomes and range from 0 (full health) to 1
estimates are generated using cancer-specific and sex- (equivalent to death; appendix 1 p 81). The estimates of
specific Cause of Death Ensemble models (CODEm).22 YLDs and YLLs were summed to generate DALY
CODEm uses all available mortality data and cause- estimates.
specific covariates to estimate mortality for each age All point estimates in this analysis represent the mean
group, sex, location, and year estimated in GBD 2023, of the estimated draws and are reported with
selecting the optimal model based on out-of-sample corresponding 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs), estimated
predictive validity (appendix 1 pp 59–74). Mortality data as the 2·5th and 97·5th percentiles of 250 draws at each
included in cancer CODEm models include vital cancer estimation step and propagated through each step
registration system and verbal autopsy data, as well as (appendix 1 pp 51–81). More detailed method descriptions
population-based cancer registry incidence data that have can be found in appendix 1 and in the broader GBD 2023
been transformed into mortality data through mortality- capstone publications.14,18,19,21
to-incidence ratios (MIRs). This transformation allowed
for increased data availability, particularly for locations Reporting definitions
where mortality data were scarce. In GBD 2023, cancer Childhood cancers were defined as those occurring at
registry data were adjusted to align with vital registration ages 0–19 years for this analysis. As some countries and
system data; where cancer registry data directly overlapped organisations define childhood cancers as occurring at
with vital registration data, cancer registry data were ages 0–14 years, results are available for this age range
For the GBD Results Tool see excluded from CODEm models.21 MIRs were primarily and more specific age group subsets in the GBD Results
https://vizhub.healthdata.org/ estimated using a spatiotemporal Gaussian process Tool. Cancers as defined in ICD-10 chapter II,23 C00–C97,
gbd-results regression (ST-GPR).18 For hepatoblastoma and are included in this analysis (details on cancer types
retinoblastoma, two cancers with lower data availability estimated and their corresponding definitions are
and relatively fewer deaths, MIRs were estimated using included in appendix 1 pp 12–21). Other malignant
negative binomial models. ST-GPR modelling used epithelial neoplasms were not a GBD cancer cause but
incidence and mortality data from population-based were grouped together for the purposes of this analysis
cancer registries, while negative binomial models used in an eort to present results in similar categories as the
cancer registry incidence and mortality data as well as International Classification of Childhood Cancer, 3rd
1362
Articles
edition (ICCC-3),24 and included the following GBD Role of the funding source
cancer causes: bladder cancer, breast cancer, cervical The funders of the study had no role in study design,
cancer, colon and rectum cancer, lip and oral cavity data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or the
cancer, malignant skin melanoma, nasopharynx cancer, writing of the report.
pancreatic cancer, stomach cancer, thyroid cancer, and
tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer. For results of Results
cancer burden presented in alignment with the WHO There were 377 000 incident cases of childhood
GICC, the GBD cause brain and central nervous system cancers (95% UI 288 000–489 000), 144 000 deaths
(CNS) cancers was used in place of the WHO indicator (131 000–162 000), and 11·7 million (10·7–13·2) DALYs
cancer low-grade gliomas, and the GBD cause kidney estimated due to cancer in children globally in 2023
cancer was used in place of the more specific WHO (table). These DALYs were composed of a greater number
indicator cancer Wilms tumour. Results are presented of YLLs (11·5 million [10·5–13·0]) than YLDs (176 000
by various groupings, including GBD world super- [108 000–279 000]; appendix 2 p 18). While higher SDI
regions, SDI quintiles,18 WHO world regions,25 and settings had the greatest age-standardised incidence
World Bank income groupings26 (appendix 2 pp 8–12). rates for childhood cancer, they generally had the lowest
Rates are reported per 100 000 person-years, with the age-standardised mortality rates (table). The majority of
GBD 2023 world standard population used for childhood cancer burden occurred in settings with
calculation of age-standardised rates (appendix 1 limited resources, with 85·1% (82·9–87·5) of incident
pp 81–82). GBD 2023 provides estimates for additional cases, 94·1% (93·5–94·8) of deaths, and 94·1% For GBD Compare see https://
vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-
cancer types, measures, and groupings that are not (93·4–94·7) of DALYs occurring in LMICs (comprising
compare/
included in this Article but are available online through low-income, lower-middle-income, and upper-middle-
For GBD Cancer Compare see
the GBD Results Tool, GBD Compare, and GBD Cancer income countries by World Bank grouping; appendix 2
https://vizhub.healthdata.org/
Compare visualisations. p 15). The WHO Western Pacific region and African gbd-compare/cancer
Incident cases, Age- Percentage of Deaths, Age- Percentage of DALYs, millions Age- Percentage of
thousands standardised global cases thousands standardised global deaths standardised global DALYs
incidence mortality DALY rate per
rate per rate per 100 000 person-
100 000 person- 100 000 person- years
years years
Global 377 14·3 100·0% 144 5·4 100·0% 11·7 443·6 100·0%
(288–489) (10·9–18·6) (100·0–100·0) (131–162) (4·9–6·1) (100·0–100·0) (10·7–13·2) (404·0–498·0) (100·0–100·0)
WHO regions
African region 91·3 14·3 24·4% 49·0 7·7 34·1% 4·01 628·6 34·2%
(74·6–112) (11·7–17·6) (21·2–27·8) (42·6–58·2) (6·7–9·1) (31·8–36·6) (3·50–4·77) (546·9–747·0) (31·8–36·9)
Eastern Mediterranean 52·4 16·1 13·9% 21·9 6·7 15·2% 1·79 548·1 15·2%
region (40·1–68·0) (12·3–20·9) (12·7–14·8) (18·5–25·0) (5·7–7·7) (13·9–16·3) (1·51–2·04) (463·0–626·1) (13·9–16·3)
European region 40·0 18·6 10·6% 8·02 3·7 5·6% 0·660 303·6 5·6%
(27·6–55·6) (12·7–25·9) (9·0–11·9) (7·64–8·38) (3·5–3·8) (5·0–6·1) (0·627–0·690) (288·3–318·2) (5·0–6·2)
Region of the 49·5 17·1 13·1% 14·3 4·9 10·0% 1·16 397·9 9·9%
Americas (37·5–67·5) (12·9–23·4) (11·8–14·4) (13·6–14·8) (4·6–5·1) (8·9–10·9) (1·11–1·20) (379·4–413·2) (8·8–10·8)
South-East Asia 49·2 7·9 13·1% 23·3 3·7 16·2% 1·88 303·7 16·0%
region (38·6–63·1) (6·2–10·2) (11·3–14·6) (19·8–27·6) (3·2–4·4) (14·4–17·9) (1·59–2·22) (257·3–356·0) (14·2–17·7)
Western Pacific region 93·0 17·3 24·5% 26·9 4·8 18·7% 2·19 396·7 18·7%
(65·1–135) (12·1–25·0) (21·7–27·8) (24·2–31·1) (4·3–5·5) (17·1–20·3) (1·99–2·53) (358·7–453·9) (17·1–20·3)
SDI quintiles
High 102 18·6 26·8% 19·5 3·4 13·6% 1·60 284·0 13·6%
(69·0–149) (12·5–27·4) (23·4–30·6) (18·3–20·9) (3·2–3·7) (12·3–14·7) (1·50–1·71) (266·1–305·8) (12·3–14·9)
High-middle 73·6 16·4 19·5% 23·7 5·1 16·5% 1·92 421·4 16·4%
(54·1–102) (12·0–22·7) (18·2–21·1) (21·9–26·0) (4·8–5·6) (15·5–17·3) (1·78–2·10) (391·4–460·8) (15·4–17·3)
Middle 46·3 14·0 12·3% 18·5 5·6 12·9% 1·51 453·8 12·9%
(35·2–61·4) (10·6–18·6) (11·7–12·8) (16·9–20·8) (5·1–6·2) (12·3–13·5) (1·37–1·69) (412·8–508·4) (12·2–13·5)
Low-middle 47·2 10·4 12·6% 23·1 5·1 16·1% 1·87 414·3 16·0%
(38·2–57·5) (8·4–12·7) (11·1–13·7) (20·1–26·7) (4·4–5·9) (15·1–17·0) (1·62–2·15) (358·8–478·7) (15·0–16·9)
Low 108 12·7 28·8% 58·8 6·9 40·9% 4·81 566·1 41·0%
(90·3–133) (10·6–15·6) (24·9–32·3) (51·7–68·7) (6·1–8·1) (39·0–43·3) (4·22–5·61) (496·8–660·9) (39·0–43·4)
Values in parentheses are 95% uncertainty intervals. Estimates are presented to three significant figures for counts, or to one decimal place for rates and percentages. DALYs=disability-adjusted life-years.
SDI=Socio-demographic Index.
Table: Global burden of childhood cancer in 2023, globally and by WHO region and SDI quintile, for all sexes combined
Articles
region had the most childhood cancer cases, while the to 49 000 (42 600–58 200; table; appendix 2 p 32; GBD
WHO African region had the most childhood cancer Results Tool). From 1990 to 2023, overall childhood
deaths (table). Deaths due to childhood cancer decreased deaths decreased by 56·5% (55·8 to 57·3) globally and
by 27·0% (15·5–36·1) globally between 1990 and 2023, childhood cancer incident cases changed by –0·9%
from 197 000 (173 000–218 000) to 144 000 (–27·1 to 38·6; GBD Results Tool; appendix 2 p 26). Age-
(131 000–162 000), but increased in the WHO African standardised mortality rates decreased between 1990 and
region by 55·6% (25·5–92·4), from 31 500 (24 900–38 500) 2023 globally and in all WHO world regions, most
350000
300000
250000
200000
150000
100000
50000
Figure 1: Global childhood cancer incidence and DALY burden in 2023, by 5-year age group and overall for age 0–19 years, for all sexes combined
(A) Number of incident cases (left) and proportion of incident cases among all cases of childhood cancer (right), by cancer type. (B) Number of DALYs (left) and
proportion of DALYs among all childhood cancer DALYs (right), by cancer type. The <20 years age group represents the total of the age-specific categories.
DALYs=disability-adjusted life-years.
1364
sesac
tnedicnI
)%(
sesac
tnedicnI
75
25
11000000
10000000
9000000
8000000
7000000
6000000
5000000
4000000
3000000
2000000
1000000
0–4 5–9 10–14 15–19 <20
sYLAD
)%(
sYLAD
Other malignant neoplasms Retinoblastoma
Other malignant epithelial neoplasms Neuroblastoma and other peripheral nervous cell tumours
Ovarian cancer Brain and CNS cancer
Testicular cancer Other non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Soft tissue and other extraosseous sarcomas Burkitt lymphoma
Malignant neoplasm of bone and articular cartilage Hodgkin lymphoma
Other liver cancers Other leukaemia
Hepatoblastoma Chronic myeloid leukaemia
Kidney cancer Acute myeloid leukaemia
Other eye cancers Acute lymphoid leukaemia
A
B
75
25
0–4 5–9 10–14 15–19 <20
Age group (years) Age group (years)
Articles
A
Age-standardised incidence rate
Quintile 1 (<9·0 per 100000 person-years)
Quintile 2 (9·0 to <11·5 per 100000 person-years)
Quintile 3 (11·5 to <14·5 per 100000 person-years)
Quintile 4 (14·5 to <19·0 per 100000 person-years)
Quintile 5 (≥19·0 per 100000 person-years)
Eastern
Caribbean and central America Persian Gulf Balkan Peninsula Southeast Asia West Africa Mediterranean
Northern Europe
B
Age-standardised mortality rate
Quintile 1 (<2·7 per 100000 person-years)
Quintile 2 (2·7 to <3·7 per 100000 person-years)
Quintile 3 (3·7 to <4·8 per 100000 person-years)
Quintile 4 (4·8 to <6·5 per 100000 person-years)
Quintile 5 (≥6·5 per 100000 person-years)
Eastern
Caribbean and central America Persian Gulf Balkan Peninsula Southeast Asia West Africa Mediterranean
Northern Europe
Figure 2: Global map of age-standardised childhood cancer incidence rates (A) and mortality rates (B) in 2023, for all sexes combined
Articles
notably in high and high-middle SDI settings (appendix 2 [8·2–13·8]), and other malignant neoplasms (ie,
p 32). uncategorised cancers; 10·5% [8·1–13·1]). The
Across the childhood cancer age groups globally contribution of solid tumours to total cancer DALY
in 2023, the greatest numbers of incident cases and burden was higher in the 0–4 years (28·2% [22·9–33·7])
DALYs occurred in the 0–4 years age group, with and 15–19 years (44·8% [41·3–48·8]) age groups than in
124 000 cases (95% UI 92 200–169 000) and 3·65 million the 5–9 years (16·9% [14·1–19·3]) and 10–14 years (21·6%
(3·20–4·22) DALYs, followed by the 15–19 years age [17·6–25·9]) age groups. The proportion of uncategorised
group (99 400 cases [78 500–123 000] and 2·96 million cancers (other malignant neoplasms) was greatest in the
[2·66–3·29] DALYs; figure 1). The majority of childhood 0–4 years age group at 14·1% (10·5–17·9). The majority
cancer DALY burden for ages 0–19 years was from of global childhood cancer DALY burden in 2023 was
leukaemias (31·9% [28·2–37·1]), brain and CNS cancers composed of YLLs, at 98·5% (97·6–99·1; appendix 2
(16·2% [13·6–19·7]), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (10·6% p 40).
The global burden of several cancer types estimated for
the first time in GBD in the 2021 iteration, and presented
for childhood and adolescent age groups for the first time
in this GBD 2023 analysis, are detailed in appendix 2 (p 41).
These new cancer causes (Burkitt lymphoma, other non-
Hodgkin lymphoma, soft tissue and other extraosseous
sarcomas, malignant neoplasms of bone and articular
cartilage, neuroblastoma and other peripheral nervous cell
tumours, hepatoblastoma, retinoblastoma, and other eye
cancers) comprised 29·6% (95% UI 25·9–33·2) of
childhood cancer DALYs globally in 2023 (figure 1). Among
this newly modelled burden, malignant neoplasms of
bone and articular cartilage accounted for a particularly
large proportion of overall childhood cancer DALYs in the
10–14 years (12·3% [8·4–16·6]) and 15–19 years (14·8%
[10·6–19·4]) age groups, while other non-Hodgkin
lymphoma comprised the largest proportion among the
new cancer types in the 0–4 years (7·9% [5·8–11·2]) and
5–9 years (8·5% [6·2–11·1]) age groups (figure 1).
The global geographical distribution of age-
standardised childhood cancer incidence rates in 2023
was most prominent in HICs, while age-standardised
childhood cancer mortality rates was weighted towards
lower-income countries in the WHO African and Eastern
Mediterranean regions (table; figure 2; appendix 2 p 15).
The WHO regions with greatest mortality also tended to
be regions with sparse data and consequently greater
uncertainty in estimates (appendix 2 pp 2–5). In 2023,
age-standardised YLLs due to childhood cancer, reflective
of premature mortality, were inversely correlated with
country-level SDI (Pearson correlation coecient –0·658
[95% UI –0·708 to –0·604]). There was generally a wider
spread of age-standardised YLL rates in lower SDI
settings than higher SDI settings (figure 3).
Childhood cancer was the eighth-leading cause of
childhood death globally in 2023, following neonatal
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 disorders, congenital birth defects, road injuries, and
several communicable diseases such as lower
respiratory infections and malaria, but with greater
Figure 3: The association between SDI and age-standardised rates of
burden than other communicable diseases such as
childhood cancer YLLs in 2023, for all sexes combined
Results are presented at the country level. Each circle represents one country, measles, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS (figure 4A). The
with size relative to the contry’s total population aged 0–19 years. The grey line contribution of childhood cancer to childhood deaths in
and shading represent the mean and 95% UI, respectively, for a linear regression 2023, as represented by ranking of the number of
between SDI and the age-standardised YLL rate (Pearson correlation coefficient
deaths compared with those caused by other diseases
–0·675 [95% UI –0·723 to –0·618]). SDI=Socio-demographic Index.
UI=uncertainty interval. YLLs=years of life lost. and injuries, was greater in higher SDI settings,
1366
)sraey-nosrep
000001
rep(
sLLY
desidradnats-egA
Population
50000
500000
5000000
50000000
250000 000
GBD Super-region
Central Europe, eastern Europe, and central Asia
High income
Latin America and Caribbean
North Africa and Middle East
South Asia
Southeast Asia, east Asia, and Oceania
Sub-Saharan Africa
SDI
Articles
ranking third in high SDI and fifth in high-middle SDI were in the African region (28·6% [23·7–34·0]) and
quintiles, and lower in lower SDI settings, ranking South-East Asia region (36·6% [30·7–43·8]), with the
seventh in the middle SDI and low-middle SDI other WHO GICC indicator cancers contributing greater
quintiles, and 13th in the low SDI quintile (figure 4A). proportional deaths in the African region than in the
Childhood cancer was the 11th-leading cause of other WHO world regions (figure 5). Globally, of the
childhood DALYs globally in 2023, with this burden WHO GICC indicator cancers, acute lymphoid leukaemia
ranking higher in high SDI and high-middle SDI contributed the most deaths (32 200 [24 300–41 100]) in
quintile settings compared with other SDI quintiles 2023, followed by brain and CNS cancers (23 200
(appendix 2 p 6). [18 900–29 000]), Hodgkin lymphoma (3310 [2090–4670]),
When compared with cancers occurring in adults (age retinoblastoma (3230 [1270–7010]), kidney cancer (3190
≥20 years), childhood cancers as a group ranked 18th in [2410–3960]), and Burkitt lymphoma (2960 [1960–4930];
deaths globally in 2023 out of 37 cancers, but seventh in appendix 2 p 43). Further detailed estimates for these
low SDI quintile settings (appendix 2 p 7). Childhood cancer types, and all cancer types reported in this
cancer burden expressed in DALYs was the ninth-leading analysis, globally and by WHO world region, are available
cause of total cancer DALYs globally in 2023, following in appendix 2 (pp 44–51).
more common or more fatal cancers of adulthood such
as lung cancer, colon and rectum cancer, breast cancer, Discussion
and stomach cancer (figure 4B). In lower SDI quintile Since the completion of the GBD 2017 analysis on global
settings, childhood cancer DALYs were ranked higher, childhood cancer burden, major health policy and
ranking second in low SDI and sixth in low-middle SDI academic initiatives have shifted the landscape of
and middle SDI settings. childhood cancer control worldwide. First, WHO and
Target cancers for the WHO GICC comprised 47·3% multiple global partners launched the GICC in 2018.4
(95% UI 42·2–52·0) of global childhood cancer deaths Since then, more than 75 governments have
in 2023 (figure 5). This percentage varied by WHO world demonstrated a commitment to implementing childhood
region, with greater contributions of childhood cancer cancer control programmes either as WHO GICC focus
deaths in the region of the Americas of 55·7% countries or through activities aligned with the initiative’s
(53·6–57·3) and lesser contributions in the South-East CureAll framework.27 Second, with the launch of the St
Asia region of 42·1% (35·9–49·4). Brain and CNS Jude Global Alliance28 in 2018, over 400 hospitals and
cancers and acute lymphoid leukaemia comprised the non-profit foundations in more than 90 countries are
largest proportion of deaths out of the WHO index working collaboratively to implement novel and evidence-
cancers in each region. The smallest percentages of based interventions29,30 and improve health-care delivery
childhood cancer due to these two cancers combined services for childhood cancer at the institutional level.
A
Rank
Global High High-middle Middle Low-middle Low
Deaths (95% UIs) SDI SDI SDI SDI SDI
Neonatal disorders 1630000 (1510000–1 750 000) 1 1 1 1 1 1
Lower respiratory infections 712000 (588000–855000) 2 6 3 3 2 2
Congenital birth defects 510000 (396000–647000) 3 2 2 2 3 5
Malaria 473000 (180000–876000) 4 92 17 5 5 3
Diarrhoeal diseases 380000 (279000–525000) 5 19 6 6 4 4
Road injuries 220000 (170000–282000) 6 4 4 4 6 7
Meningitis 148000 (112000–208000) 7 2 1 1 8 10 8 8
Childhood cancer 144000 (131000–162000) 8 3 5 7 7 13
Measles 142000 (57700–252000) 9 52 36 26 20 6
Drowning 127000 (95 300–166 000) 10 9 7 8 9 11
Pertussis 113000 (65000–185 000) 11 32 1 4 12 12 10
Protein-energy malnutrition 105000 (75500–142000) 12 45 1 3 24 16 9
Tuberculosis 87800 (59400–124000) 13 47 2 2 16 14 12
Sexually transmitted infections excluding HIV 74100 (27100–143000) 14 35 1 6 15 17 15
HIV/AIDS 72000 (61900–84700) 15 38 1 1 29 21 14
Interpersonal violence 68900 (57200–87000) 16 10 8 13 15 19
Self-harm 63400 (53500–76300) 17 7 9 20 11 26
Typhoid and paratyphoid 60500 (31900–101000) 18 48 2 0 23 10 17
Invasive non-typhoidal salmonella 59300 (43000–80500) 19 77 5 3 44 28 16
COVID-19 52900 (48300–57800) 20 15 1 5 9 30 23
(Figure 4 continues on next page)
Articles
B
Rank
Global High High-middle Middle Low-middle Low
DALYs (95% UIs) SDI SDI SDI SDI SDI
Tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer 46600000 (42400000–50700000) 1 1 1 1 2 7
Colon and rectum cancer 26100000 (23700000–28500 000) 2 2 3 3 7 6
Breast cancer 24500000 (21600000–28000 000) 3 4 4 2 1 3
Stomach cancer 22500000 (19200000–25900 000) 4 3 2 4 5 4
Oesophageal cancer 14000000 (12600000–15800000) 5 6 5 10 4 8
Liver cancer 13500000 (11800000–15500000) 6 7 6 5 9 5
Cervical cancer 13100000 (10000000–17100000) 7 1 5 7 7 3 1
Pancreatic cancer 12300000 (11400000–13100 000) 8 5 8 8 17 16
Childhood cancer 11700000 (10700000–13200000) 9 20 9 6 6 2
Prostate cancer 8910000 (7870000–10000000) 10 8 12 12 11 10
Brain and CNS cancer 7260000 (6340000–8670000) 11 9 10 9 16 17
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 7080000 (6160000–8080000) 12 10 13 13 13 11
Lip and oral cavity cancer 6420000 (5540000–7570000) 13 18 11 15 8 9
Ovarian cancer 6400000 (5400000–7540 000) 14 12 14 11 10 12
Other malignant neoplasms 5460000 (4720000–6110 000) 15 14 15 14 14 13
Bladder cancer 4620000 (4220000–5120000) 16 11 18 18 21 20
Gallbladder and biliary tract cancer 4000000 (3460000–4800000) 17 16 16 21 18 18
Kidney cancer 3780000 (3390000–4200 000) 18 13 20 24 28 30
Larynx cancer 3560000 (2990000–4290000) 19 23 17 19 15 15
Other pharynx cancer 3330000 (2680000–4160000) 20 24 19 23 12 14
Acute myeloid leukaemia 3310000 (2800000–3920000) 21 17 21 17 22 23
Uterine cancer 2900000 (2470000–3390000) 22 21 25 22 23 26
Multiple myeloma 2810000 (2540000–3130000) 23 19 24 28 24 28
Nasopharynx cancer 2500000 (2080000–2950000) 24 25 22 16 19 19
Malignant neoplasm of bone and articular cartilage 2120000 (1680000–2690000) 25 28 23 20 20 21
Malignant skin melanoma 1810000 (1600000–2 130000) 26 22 30 32 32 31
Acute lymphoid leukaemia 1740000 (1150000–2350000) 27 30 26 25 29 25
Soft tissue and other extraosseous sarcomas 1700000 (1380000–2150000) 28 26 29 29 25 22
Other leukaemia 1690000 (1300000–2190000) 29 29 27 26 26 29
Thyroid cancer 1500000 (1260000–1780 000) 30 31 28 27 27 24
Chronic lymphoid leukaemia 983000 (866000–1180000) 31 27 31 34 34 35
Hodgkin lymphoma 922000 (700000–1200000) 32 34 32 31 30 27
Chronic myeloid leukaemia 720000 (562000–922000) 33 33 34 30 31 32
Mesothelioma 624000 (553000–695000) 34 32 35 35 35 36
Testicular cancer 552000 (443000–686000) 35 35 33 33 33 33
Eye cancer 196000 (150000–261000) 36 36 37 36 36 34
Neuroblastoma and other peripheral nervous cell tumours 121000 (104000–147000) 37 37 36 37 37 37
Figure 4: Contribution of childhood cancer to global child deaths and all-age cancer DALYs in 2023, for all sexes combined
(A) Rankings by cause comparing the absolute number of global deaths among the top 20 Level 3 categories of disease in GBD in ages 0–19 years. (B) Rankings by cause comparing the absolute
number of global DALYs in GBD for childhood cancer (all cancers for ages 0–19 years) with individual cancer causes for ages 20 years to ≥95 years (these cancer-specific rows exclude DALYs for ages
0–19 years). For both sets of rankings, causes are ordered in descending absolute value of the global estimates, with childhood cancer in bold. Cells are coloured according to rank, ranging from highest
rank (red) to lowest rank (green). The final five columns provide the rankings of these top global causes within each SDI quintile. DALYs=disability-adjusted life-years. GBD=Global Burden of Diseases,
Injuries, and Risk Factors Study. SDI=Socio-demographic Index. UI=uncertainty interval.
Third, eorts to expand capacity for local childhood this framework and the WHO initiative, however, are the
cancer data collection and dissemination were initiated need for improved epidemiological data to better inform
in 2020 with the childhood oshoot of the International stakeholders interested in improving childhood cancer
Agency for Research on Cancer’s Global Initiative for outcomes through health systems and health service
Cancer Registries (ChildGICR),15,16 which holds great delivery interventions. Estimates of international and
promise for improving the currently inadequate observed national cancer burden patterns are important to inform
cancer surveillance data globally.13 More recently, the these eorts as well as national cancer control plans, but
2020 Lancet Oncology Commission on sustainable care not every country has the surveillance systems necessary
for children with cancer31 was completed, providing an to generate these data.
investment case and roadmap to monitoring childhood To contribute to the broader ongoing eorts to improve
cancers through a proposed indicator framework focused outcomes for childhood cancers globally, we updated
on reducing financial hardship for patients and families, estimates of global, regional, and national childhood
increasing access to multimodal therapy, and ensuring cancer burden across time and incorporated cancer types
quality in the provision of health services. Underlying with substantial burden in childhood and adolescent
1368
Articles
years, such as Burkitt lymphoma, soft tissue sarcomas,
malignant bone tumours, retinoblastoma, hepato-
blastoma, and neuroblastoma. This is the first time that a
global estimation group has provided a formal analysis of
estimates for these key cancers relevant to WHO GICC
goals, building to the potential to monitor global
childhood cancer control eorts and providing 75
information relevant to childhood cancer policy
development. There were an estimated 144 000 deaths
(95% UI 131 000–162 000) due to childhood cancer
in 2023, and target cancers for the WHO GICC comprised
approximately 47·3% (42·2–52·0) of global childhood 25
cancer deaths. With the addition of the nine new cancer
types into the GBD framework, only 10·5% (8·1–13·1) of
c c G d h o i B s m i e l D d a p h s a 2 e o r s 0 o e , 1 d d 7 . w w C it c i h h t a h i n l d e c a h a e c p o r h p o d ro r D e x c q i A a m u n L i c Y a r e t s i e r n s l g y r r e d e 2 p m i 6 v r · e e a 5 r s i % s n e e n t ( h 2 u a e 6 n a · s l c p 5 t a h e – t c e 2 t g s 6 r e o · u r r 5 m v i ) s i c e e i o d n s f , Global African region Europea R n e g re io g n io o n f the A S m o e u r t i h ca - s East Asia W re e g st io er n n Pacific region
ranging from chemotherapy and radiation access to
dierent surgical subspeciality services, such as
paediatric surgery, ophthalmology, orthopaedics, or Figure 5: Proportion of total childhood cancer deaths due to index cancers
for the WHO GICC in 2023, globally and by WHO region, for all sexes
neurosurgery. With greater granularity of estimates by
combined
cancer types, health-care providers and policy makers Childhood cancer is defined as that occurring at ages 0–19 years. GICC=Global
can plan human resource requirements, referral Initiative for Childhood Cancer. *All other cancer types includes all those not
networks, and financial products for cancer subtypes reported separately as WHO GICC index cancers.
included in the GICC, such as retinoblastoma and
Burkitt lymphoma. with country-level SDI, indicating that premature
The GBD framework also provides estimates of DALYs mortality due to childhood cancer is greatest in countries
for each cancer type and childhood cancers in total, with the least resources available to address it. This
with 11·7 million (95% UI 10·7–13·2) DALYs estimated finding is consistent with an analysis of childhood cancer
globally for childhood cancers in 2023. The Lancet Oncology burden using GBD 2017 estimates, which found that age-
Commission on sustainable care for children with standardised mortality rates were weighted towards
cancer31 advocated for the inclusion of childhood cancers settings with lower SDI, and underscores the need for
in essential benefits packages and financial risk global collaboration and investment in childhood cancer
protection for families of children with cancer through that targets support for LMICs. Additionally, deaths due
the elimination of out-of-pocket expenditures. To meet to childhood cancers decreased by 27·0% (15·5–36·1)
this goal, health policy makers and economists often rely globally between 1990 and 2023. During the same time
on GBD-estimated DALYs, in combination with other period, overall childhood deaths decreased by 56·5%
data, to determine which interventions to cover as part of (55·8 to 57·3) and childhood cancer incident cases
their universal health coverage scale-up.32–37 Decision changed by –0·9% (–27·1 to 38·6). While these findings
making regarding health benefits packages and broader suggest progress in childhood cancer care globally for
health policy priorities are complex and context children eectively diagnosed, this progress has been
dependent, but data on the burden of childhood cancer unbalanced, with childhood cancer deaths increasing in
relative to other diseases of childhood and to adult the African region by 55·6% (25·5–92·4), from 31 500
cancers might be useful for some countries. We found (24 900–38 500) in 1990 to 49 000 (42 600–58 200) in 2023.
that childhood cancers were the eighth-leading cause of This increase in childhood cancer deaths is likely partially
childhood death and the ninth-leading cause of total driven by regional population changes, as childhood
cancer DALYs globally in 2023, with variation by SDI. cancer age-standardised mortality rates decreased
These comprehensive and more granular new results globally and in all WHO world regions. Additionally,
will be important for the ongoing implementation work although global eorts to address childhood cancer
associated with the WHO GICC and for the many global burden are ongoing, the distal impacts of current global
partners working on childhood cancer control initiatives childhood cancer control eorts will take years to
locally and internationally. visualise in GBD models. Further analyses forecasting
From a broader perspective, GBD 2023 estimates the burden of childhood cancer over the coming decades
continue to show persistent inequities in childhood will be important, allowing for national and international
cancer burden globally. In 2023, age-standardised YLL policy makers to project the changing disease burden
rates due to childhood cancers were inversely correlated and adjust policies and interventions accordingly.
)%(
shtaed
recnac
doohdlihc
lla
fo noitroporP
Acute lymphoid leukaemia Kidney cancer
Brain and CNS cancer Retinoblastoma
Burkitt lymphoma All other cancer types*
Hodgkin lymphoma
Mediterr E a a n s e t a e n rn r e g ion
WHO region
Articles
While the estimates of the burden of childhood and related sarcomas of the bone. Fourth, as access to
cancers produced by GBD 2023 are valuable and quality of childhood cancer services improves
contributions to global childhood cancer control, there worldwide, there will be an increasing number of
are limitations as well as future opportunities to expand survivors, and the current GBD framework does not
estimation eorts. First, while UIs are estimated and estimate the lifelong disease burden anticipated in this
provided with all measures in GBD, there is greater growing population. Eorts to address this challenging
uncertainty in countries that generally have fewer data limitation are under consideration. Fifth, current GBD
available and likely fewer resources to support the estimation cannot completely account for cancer
recording and reporting of these data. Additionally, UI mimics that might result in misdiagnosis in children
estimates cannot account for every potential bias. In and potentially inaccurate cause-of-death data.13 Finally,
GBD, corrections to the data are made to address GBD does not currently externally report estimates of
measurement error and, in cause-of-death estimation, childhood cancer survival, and previous modelling
ensemble modelling is used to deal with model eorts have been single publications that are not
misspecification bias as much as possible; however, updated over time with new data or improved methods.
residual bias aecting results cannot be excluded. The generation of global childhood cancer survival
Relatedly, because models are fitted across each cancer estimates in a continuously updated modelling
cause’s entire age range, data for age groups older than framework that routinely produces estimates across
19 years might influence childhood cancer estimates, time, such as GBD, would allow for formal tracking of
particularly when data are unavailable in childhood age WHO GICC progress where survival data are not
groups. These challenges underscore the importance of currently available, and should be a priority in the
reliable incidence and mortality data to inform future. This does not negate the importance of
childhood cancer burden estimates, and eorts under supporting and generating childhood cancer survival
way through the ChildGICR initiative15 to establish and results as locally as possible around the world, but
improve childhood cancer registration systems are would aid country planning where this information is
crucial to inform our understanding of the burden of not available, and would help overall global tracking
childhood cancer. As the ability to capture and report eorts. More general limitations of the GBD study have
more detailed aspects of childhood cancer diagnoses been discussed in other publications.14,18,19,21
and outcomes develops, incorporating these data into In summary, this updated analysis of the global burden
future GBD rounds would be expected to improve of childhood cancer provides estimates for 20 cancer
estimates of childhood cancer burden locally, regionally, categories—including for nine additional cancer causes
and globally. compared with previous GBD analyses, which represent
A second limitation of this study is that, given delays important cancers in children—from 1990 to 2023. The
in population-based data availability during the addition of new cancer types relevant to children is an
COVID-19 pandemic, this analysis did not incorporate important step towards aligning with WHO GICC
changes in childhood cancer burden due to the influence targets. This study highlights that childhood cancer
of the pandemic. Reports thus far suggest a decrease in persists as a substantial contributor to health loss in
diagnosis of childhood cancers in some locations and children, and that considerable disparities in childhood
reduced access to treatment services during the early cancer burden persist globally across a range of
pandemic period, with treatment access challenges demographic factors, including by SDI and world region.
greater in LMICs.38,39 As cancer surveillance data We found that resource-limited settings are
continue to emerge with adequate diversity in disproportionately burdened by childhood cancer,
geographical representation and across the span of indicating that future eorts to decrease the global
time, understanding the eect of the COVID-19 childhood cancer burden must focus on addressing
pandemic on childhood cancer burden on a global scale inequities and expanding access to comprehensive
will be important to informing future preparation cancer services. We anticipate that these estimates will
endeavours. Third, GBD estimates currently do not enhance eorts by UN agencies, governments, and other
separately report burden due to low-grade gliomas, a relevant childhood cancer stakeholders to design and
childhood cancer subgroup that causes substantial implement cancer control programmes and interventions
burden in children40 and a GICC index cancer type. Our worldwide.
current analysis used malignant CNS cancer burden as
GBD 2023 Childhood Cancer Collaborators
a surrogate for low-grade gliomas and thus likely Lisa M Force*, Jonathan M Kocarnik, Miranda L May,
overestimated the fatal burden of WHO target cancers Kayleigh Bhangdia, Andrew Crist, Louise Penberthy, Natalie Pritchett,
in total. Similarly, several new GBD causes are based on Alistair Acheson, Lee Deitesfeld, Hasan Aalruz,
Yohannes Habtegiorgis Abate, Mohamed Abouzid,
ICCC-3 diagnostic groups, such as malignant bone
Lucas Guimarães Abreu, Salahdein Aburuz, Fatemeh Afrashteh,
tumours and soft tissue sarcomas, and are not currently Muhammad Sohail Afzal, Danish Ahmad, Ayman Ahmed,
disaggregated into clinically important subgroups such Syed Anees Ahmed, Hanadi Al Hamad, Mohammed Albashtawy,
Wafa A Aldhaleei, Robert Kaba Alhassan, Abid Ali, Sabah Al-Marwani,
as rhabdomyos arcoma, osteosarcoma, or Ewing sarcoma
1370
Articles
Awais Altaf, Safwat Aly, Karem H Alzoubi, Nguyen Hoang Anh, Munkhtuya Tumurkhuu, Aniefiok John Udoakang, Muhammad Umair,
Saeid Anvari, Mosab Arafat, Aleksandr Y Aravkin, Demelash Areda, Srikanth Umakanthan, Yasir Waheed, Ahmed Bilal Waqar,
Abdulfatai Aremu, Benedetta Armocida, Mahwish Arooj, Muhammad Waqas, Ronny Westerman, Hong Xiao, Galal Yahya,
Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi, Seyyed Shamsadin Athari, Zeamanuel Anteneh Yigzaw, Dong Keon Yon, Mohammed G M Zeariya,
Maha Moh’d Wahbi Atout, Lemessa Assefa A Ayana, Shahkaar Aziz, Mohammed Zuber, Theo Vos, Christopher J L Murray,
Ahmed Y Azzam, Razieh Bahreini, Soham Bandyopadhyay, Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo†, Nickhill Bhakta*†.
Shirin Barati, Mohammad-Mahdi Bastan, Maryam Bemanalizadeh, *Co-corresponding authors. †Co-senior authors.
Jasvinder Singh Bhatti, Cem Bilgin, Catherine Bisignano,
Affiliations
Sri Harsha Boppana, Souad Bouaoud, Yasser Bustanji, Giulia Carreras,
See appendix 3 (pp 3–10) for collaborators’ aliations. See Online for appendix 3
Ferrán Catalá-López, Chiranjib Chakraborty,
Promit Ananyo Chakraborty, Anis Ahmad Chaudhary, Dong-Woo Choi, Contributors
Isaac Sunday Chukwu, Bashir Dabo, Xiaochen Dai, Lalit Dandona, See appendix 3 (pp 10–13) for more detailed information about
Rakhi Dandona, Samuel Demissie Darcho, Aso Mohammad Darwesh, individual author contributions to the research, divided into the
Aragaw Tesfaw Desale, Thao Huynh Phuong Do, Paul Narh Doku, following categories: managing the overall research enterprise; writing
Robert Kokou Dowou, John Dube, Abdel Rahman E’mar, the first draft of the manuscript; primary responsibility for applying
Maysaa El Sayed Zaki, Hala Rashad Elhabashy, Mohammed Elshaer, analytical methods to produce estimates; primary responsibility for
Chadi Eltaha, Theophilus I Emeto, Sayeh Ezzikouri, seeking, cataloguing, extracting, or cleaning data; designing or coding
Adewale Oluwaseun Fadaka, Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe, figures and tables; providing data or critical feedback on data sources;
Omotayo Francis Fagbule, Ayesha Fahim, Mohammad Farahmand, developing methods or computational machinery; providing critical
Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan, Takeshi Fukumoto, feedback on methods or results; drafting the manuscript or revising it
Miglas Welay Gebregergis, Teferi Gebru Gebremeskel, critically for important intellectual content; and managing the
Saroja Devi Geetha, Genanew K Getahun, Nermin Ghith, estimation or publications process. The corresponding authors
Logan M Glasstetter, Veer Bala Gupta, Awoke Derbie Habteyohannes, (L M Force and N Bhakta) had final responsibility for the decision to
Dariush Haghmorad, Arvin Haj-Mirzaian, Nadia M Hamdy, submit for publication. Membersof the Institute for Health Metrics and
Md Kamrul Hasan, Hamidreza Hasani, Ali Hasanpour- Dehkordi, Evaluation Cancer Team had full access to the underlying data used to
Johannes Haubold, Simon I Hay, Khezar Hayat, Mehdi Hosseinzadeh, generate estimates presented in this Article. All other authors had access
Kiavash Hushmandi, Hong-Han Huynh, Bing-Fang Hwang, Arit Inok, to and reviewed estimates as part of the research evaluation process,
Md Irteja Islam, Md Rabiul Islam, Akhil Jain, which includes additional stages of formal review.
Ammar Abdulrahman Jairoun, Farahnaz Joukar, Ali Kabir,
Declaration of interests
Abdulkareem Kabir, Arman Karimi Behnagh, Foad Kazemi,
L M Force reports support for the present manuscript from St Jude
Alireza Khalilian, Shaghayegh Khanmohammadi, Haitham Khatatbeh,
Children’s Research Hospital and the Gates Foundation; grants or
Hamid Reza Khayat Kashani, Khalid A Kheirallah, Feriha Fatima Khidri,
contracts from St Baldrick’s Foundation, Conquer Cancer Foundation, and
Majid Khosravi, Sepehr Khosravi, Min Seo Kim, Adnan Kisa, Sezer Kisa,
National Institutes of Health Loan Repayment Program; leadership or
Farzad Kompani, Ashwin Laxmikant Kotnis, Claudia E. Kuehni,
fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group
G Anil Kumar, Carlo La Vecchia, Tuo Lan, Minh Huu Nhat Le,
(unpaid) as a Lancet Oncology International Advisory Board member,
Sang-woong Lee, Seung Won Lee, Wei-Chen Lee, Ming-Chieh Li,
all outside the submitted work. N M Ghith reports support for attending
Xuefeng Liu, Hawraz Ibrahim M. Amin, Hassan Magdy Abd El Razek,
meetings and travel from the Danish Data Science Institute at the
Vahid Mansouri, Yasith Mathangasinghe, Endalkachew Belayneh Melese,
Technical University of Denmark (travel grant in July, 2023), outside the
Tomislav Mestrovic, Sachith Mettananda, Irmina Maria Michalek,
submitted work. J Kocarnik reports support for the present manuscript
Giuseppe Minervini, Mizan Kiros Mirutse, Nouh Saad Mohamed,
from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, the Gates
Ali H Mokdad, Lorenzo Monasta, Mohammad Moradi-Joo,
Foundation, and the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities.
Paula Moraga, Rohith Motappa, Soroush Najdaghi,
M-C Li reports grants or contracts from the National Science and
Hastyar Hama Rashid Najmuldeen, Gopal Nambi, Shumaila Nargus,
Technology Council, Taiwan (grant number 113-2314-B-003-002) and the
Muhammad Naveed, Athare Nazri-Panjaki, Robina Khan Niazi,
“Higher Education Sprout Project” of National Taiwan Normal University;
Syed Toukir Ahmed Noor, Chisom Adaobi Nri-Ezedi,
leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy
Ogochukwu Janet Nzoputam, Chimezie Igwegbe Nzoputam,
group (paid or unpaid) as a Technical Editor of the
Akinyemi O D Ofakunrin, Hany A Omar, Sok King Ong, Michal Ordak,
Journal of the American Heart Association, all outside the submitted work.
Verner N Orish, Jagadish Rao Padubidri, Georgios D Panos,
L Monasta reports support for the present manuscript from the Italian
Romil R Parikh, Jay Patel, Shankargouda Patil, Prince Peprah,
Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente 34/2017), payments made to the
Konrad Pesudovs, Dimitri Poddighe, Jagadeesh Puvvula,
Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo.
Raghu Anekal Radhakrishnan, Pracheth Raghuveer, Saeed Rahmani,
G D Panos reports support for attending meetings and travel from Roche
Mahmoud Mohammed Ramadan, Shakthi Kumaran Ramasamy,
Hellas and Bayer Hellas, all outside the submitted work.
Kiana Ramezanzadeh, Ashkan Rasouli-Saravani, Nima Rezaei,
Y L Samodra reports grants or contracts from Taipei Medical University
Nazila Rezaei, Nitai Roy, Priyanka Roy, Cameron John Sabet,
and National Science and Technology Council for National Taiwan
Mohammad Reza Saeb, Umar Saeed, Mehdi Safari, Sher Zaman Safi,
University; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee
Sare Safi, Narjes Saheb Sharif-Askari, Fatemeh Saheb Sharif-Askari,
or advocacy group (paid or unpaid) as Co-founder of Benang Merah
Amirhossein Sahebkar, S Mohammad Sajadi, Mohamed A Saleh,
Research Center; other financial or non-financial interests as mentor with
Leili Salehi, Yoseph Leonardo Samodra, Abdallah M Samy,
Jago Beasiswa (idebeasiswa.com), all outside the submitted work.
Made Ary Sarasmita, Aswini Saravanan, Tanmay Sarkar,
B M Schaarschmidt reports grants or contracts from Else Kröner-Fresenius
Maheswar Satpathy, Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt, Art Schuermans,
Foundation, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, and PharmaCept;
Allen Seylani, Samiah Shahid, Hamid R Shahsavari,
payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus,
Moyad Jamal Shahwan, Masood Ali Shaikh, Muhammad Aaqib Shamim,
manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Boston
Anas Shamsi, Alfiya Shamsutdinova, Mohammed Shannawaz,
Scientific, and MedMile; support for attending meetings and/or travel
Maryam Shayan, B Suresh Kumar Shetty, Premalatha K Shetty,
from Bayer, all outside the submitted work. R Tabares-Seisdedos reports
Mahabalesh Shetty, Aminu Shittu, Zahra Shokati Eshkiki,
grants or contracts from Valencian Regional Government’s Ministry of
Seyed Afshin Shorofi, Sunil Shrestha, Emmanuel Edwar Siddig,
Education (PROMETEO/CIPROM/2022/58) and The Spanish Ministry of
Surjit Singh, Paramdeep Singh, Reed J D Sorensen,
Science, Innovation and Universities (PID2021-129099OB-I00).
Muhammad Suleman, Chandan Kumar Swain, Lukasz Szarpak,
Sree Sudha T Y, Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos, Jabeen Taiba, Iman M Talaat, Data sharing
Nathan Y Tat, Abdelghani Tbakhi, Mohamad-Hani Temsah, To download the data used in these analyses, please visit the Global
Rasiah Thayakaran, Marcos Roberto Tovani-Palone, Thang Huu Tran, Health Data Exchange (https://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-2023). The
Articles
statistical code used for data processing and analysis is available upon 18 GBD 2023 Disease and Injury and Risk Factor Collaborators.
request; requests should be sent to engage@healthdata.org. Burden of 375 diseases and injuries, risk-attributable burden of
88 risk factors, and healthy life expectancy in 204 countries and
Acknowledgments territories, including 660 subnational locations, 1990–2023:
This work was supported by St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, the a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.
Gates Foundation, and St Baldrick’s Foundation. We are grateful for the Lancet 2025; 406: 1873–922.
contributions of the cancer registries and vital registration systems that 19 GBD 2023 Demographics Collaborators. Global age-sex-specific all-
generate data on cancer around the world; observed data are crucial to cause mortality and life expectancy estimates for 204 countries and
understanding cancer burden. We also thank the many GBD territories and 660 subnational locations, 1950–2023: a demographic
collaborators who contributed to the GBD 2023 cancer estimates. analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. Lancet 2025;
We acknowledge the children and families impacted by childhood 406: 1731–810.
cancer—we deeply hope that the estimates provided in this analysis help 20 Stevens GA, Alkema L, Black RE, et al, and The GATHER Working
to reduce the burden of childhood cancer globally in the future. Group. Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates
Reporting: the GATHER statement. Lancet 2016; 388: e19–23.
Editorial note: The Lancet Group takes a neutral position with respect to 21 Force LM, Kocarnik JM, May ML, et al, and the GBD 2023 Cancer
territorial claims in published maps, figures, tables, and institutional Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of cancer,
aliations. 1990–2023, with forecasts to 2050: a systematic analysis for the
Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. Lancet 2025; 406: 1565–86.
References
1 Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. 22 Foreman KJ, Lozano R, Lopez AD, Murray CJ. Modeling causes of
CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73: 17–48. death: an integrated approach using CODEm. Popul Health Metr
2012; 10: 1.
2 Botta L, Gatta G, Capocaccia R, et al, and the EUROCARE-6
Working Group. Long-term survival and cure fraction estimates for 23 WHO. ICD-10: international statistical classification of diseases and
childhood cancer in Europe (EUROCARE-6): results from a related health problems: tenth revision, 2nd edn. 2004. https://iris.
population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23: 1525–36. who.int/handle/10665/42980 (accessed July 18, 2024).
3 Ward ZJ, Yeh JM, Bhakta N, Frazier AL, Girardi F, Atun R. Global 24 Steliarova-Foucher E, Stiller C, Lacour B, Kaatsch P. International
childhood cancer survival estimates and priority-setting: Classification of Childhood Cancer, third edition. Cancer 2005;
a simulation-based analysis. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20: 972–83. 103: 1457–67.
4 WHO. The Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer. https://www. 25 WHO. Countries. https://www.who.int/countries (accessed
who.int/initiatives/the-global-initiative-for-childhood-cancer Oct 17, 2023).
(accessed Oct 17, 2023). 26 The World Bank. World Bank country and lending groups. https://
5 Union for International Cancer Control. Global Initiative for Cancer datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-
Registries (GICR). https://www.uicc.org/what-we-do/sharing- bank-country-and-lending-groups (accessed July 1, 2024).
knowledge/global-initiative-cancer-registries-gicr (accessed 27 WHO. CureAll framework: WHO global initiative for childhood
Jan 8, 2024). cancer: increasing access, advancing quality, saving lives. World
6 Siddiqui AH, Zafar SN. Global availability of cancer registry data. Health Organization, 2021. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/
J Glob Oncol 2018; 4: 1–3. 347370 (accessed July 9, 2024).
7 Steliarova-Foucher E, Colombet M, Ries LAG, et al, and the IICC-3 28 St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. About St. Jude Global
contributors. International incidence of childhood cancer, 2001–10: Alliance. https://global.stjude.org/en-us/global-alliance/about.html
a population-based registry study. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 719–31. (accessed July 18, 2024).
8 Huang J, Chan SC, Ngai CH, et al, and the NCD Global Health 29 Agulnik A, Muniz-Talavera H, Pham LTD, et al, and the EVAT Study
Research Group, Association of Pacific Rim Universities (APRU). Group. Eect of paediatric early warning systems (PEWS)
Global incidence, mortality and temporal trends of cancer in children: implementation on clinical deterioration event mortality among
a joinpoint regression analysis. Cancer Med 2023; 12: 1903–11. children with cancer in resource-limited hospitals in Latin America: a
prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24: 978–88.
9 Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, et al, and the CONCORD Working
Group. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 30 McNeil MJ, Garcia Quintero X, Gonzalez M, et al. Preventing and
(CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients treating pain and anxiety during needle-based procedures in
diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries children with cancer in low- and middle-income countries.
in 71 countries. Lancet 2018; 391: 1023–75. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16: 1025.
10 Johnston WT, Erdmann F, Newton R, Steliarova-Foucher E, Schüz J, 31 Atun R, Bhakta N, Denburg A, et al. Sustainable care for children
Roman E. Childhood cancer: estimating regional and global with cancer: a Lancet Oncology Commission. Lancet Oncol 2020;
incidence. Cancer Epidemiol 2021; 71: 101662. 21: e185–224.
11 GBD 2017 Childhood Cancer Collaborators. The global burden of 32 Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Government of
childhood and adolescent cancer in 2017: an analysis of the Global Ethiopia using Global Burden of Disease evidence to achieve equity
Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20: 1211–25. and access to health care for all. https://www.healthdata.org/news-
events/insights-blog/acting-data/government-ethiopia-using-global-
12 Sharma R. A systematic examination of burden of childhood
burden-disease-evidence (accessed Oct 13, 2023).
cancers in 183 countries: estimates from GLOBOCAN 2018.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2021; 30: e13438. 33 Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Burden of disease data
help to illuminate new policy priorities in Rwanda. https://www.
13 Bhakta N, Force LM, Allemani C, et al. Childhood cancer burden:
healthdata.org/news-events/insights-blog/acting-data/burden-disease-
a review of global estimates. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20: e42–53.
data-help-illuminate-new-policy-priorities (accessed Oct 16, 2023).
14 GBD 2023 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global burden of
34 Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Using burden of
292 causes of death in 204 countries and territories and
disease data to prioritize national health resources in the
660 subnational locations, 1990–2023: a systematic analysis for the
Philippines. https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/insights-
Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. Lancet 2025; 406: 1811–72.
blog/acting-data/using-burden-disease-data-prioritize-national-
15 WHO, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Targeting health (accessed Oct 16, 2023).
childhood cancer through the Global Initiative for Cancer Registry
35 Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Understanding the ‘big
Development (ChildGICR). https://gicr.iarc.fr/child-gicr/ (accessed
picture’ can lead to a healthier population in Ghana. https://www.
Jan 8, 2024).
healthdata.org/news-events/insights-blog/acting-data/
16 WHO, International Agency for Research on Cancer. The Global understanding-big-picture-can-lead-healthier-population-ghana
Initiative for Cancer Registry Development. https://gicr.iarc.fr/ (accessed Oct 16, 2023).
about-the-gicr/ (accessed Oct 17, 2023).
36 Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Disease burden data
17 Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Protocol for the Global guide spending, health policy in Mexico. https://www.healthdata.
Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD). org/news-events/insights-blog/acting-data/disease-burden-data-
https://www.healthdata.org/research-analysis/about-gbd/protocol guide-spending-health-policy-mexico (accessed Oct 16, 2023).
(accessed July 9, 2024).
1372
Articles
37 Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. NIH to use burden of 39 Vasquez L, Sampor C, Villanueva G, et al. Early impact of the
disease data to maximize lifesaving impact of its funding. https:// COVID-19 pandemic on paediatric cancer care in Latin America.
www.healthdata.org/news-events/insights-blog/acting-data/nih-use- Lancet Oncol 2020; 21: 753–55.
burden-disease-data-maximize-lifesaving-impact-its (accessed 40 Armstrong GT, Conklin HM, Huang S, et al. Survival and long-term
Oct 16, 2023). health and cognitive outcomes after low-grade glioma. Neuro Oncol
38 Graetz D, Agulnik A, Ranadive R, et al. Global eect of the 2011; 13: 223–34.
COVID-19 pandemic on paediatric cancer care: a cross-sectional
study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2021; 5: 332–40.
---
[PDF原文](https://sci-net.xyz/storage/7932541/8702361eff3814dde1046a517f3cbf0e046272e219af16049d0b0778c101d848/Global-burden-of-cancer-in-children-and-adolescents-aged-0-19-years-1990-2023-a-systematic.pdf)
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00200-X