Pulsed Field Ablation as Initial Therapy for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.
Summary
Pulsed Field Ablation as Initial Therapy for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Original Article Abstract Background Guidelines recommend a trial of antiarrhythmic drugs before catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. Whether pulsed field ablation (PFA) may be a preferred initial treatment is unclear. Methods We conducted an international, randomized trial involving patients with previously untreated persistent atrial fibrillation. The patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ra
Content
# Pulsed Field Ablation as Initial Therapy for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.
*Original Article*
# Abstract
## Background
Guidelines recommend a trial of antiarrhythmic drugs before catheter
ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. Whether pulsed field ablation (PFA)
may be a preferred initial treatment is unclear.
## Methods
We conducted an international, randomized trial involving patients with
previously untreated persistent atrial fibrillation. The patients were randomly
assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive PFA performed with a pentaspline catheter or
to receive antiarrhythmic-drug therapy. An additional group of patients
(PFA-assigned) underwent PFA for the analysis of the primary safety end point
alone. All the patients received an insertable cardiac monitor. The primary
effectiveness end point was the short-term and long-term success of treatment
through 12 months. Short-term success was defined as procedural success in the
PFA group and the absence of ablation during the blanking period (90 days after
treatment initiation) in the antiarrhythmic-drug group. Long-term success was
defined as freedom from recurrence of atrial arrhythmias, repeat ablation, or
need for antiarrhythmic drugs from 90 days through 12 months (in the PFA group)
and freedom from amiodarone use at any time. The primary safety end point was
device- and procedure-related serious adverse events.
## Results
At 12 months, treatment success was observed in 128 of 207 patients
(Kaplan-Meier estimate, 56%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 48 to 63) in the PFA
group and in 40 of 103 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 30%; 95% CI, 21 to 40)
in the antiarrhythmic-drug group (hazard ratio for composite treatment failure
[a lack of short- and long-term success], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.65; P<0.001).
A primary safety end-point event occurred in 13 of 257 patients (5.1%) in the
combined PFA group (both randomized and PFA-assigned groups). At 12 months,
serious adverse events had occurred in 45 patients (25%) in the PFA group and in
20 patients (21%) in the antiarrhythmic-drug group.
## Conclusions
Among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, the risk of
recurrence of atrial arrhythmia was significantly lower among those who received
PFA as first-line treatment than among those who received antiarrhythmic-drug
therapy. (Funded by Boston Scientific; AVANT GUARD ClinicalTrials.gov number,
NCT06096337.).
---
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2600929