Phase 3 Trials of Inhaled Treprostinil for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Summary
Phase 3 Trials of Inhaled Treprostinil for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Original Article Abstract Background Two phase 3, randomized trials of inhaled treprostinil for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) were conducted on the basis of preclinical and clinical evidence of an antifibrotic mechanism. TETON-2 was completed first, and results were published; the results of TETON-1 and of both trials combined are reported here. Methods In the double-blind TETON-1 trial, we randomly assigned p
Content
# Phase 3 Trials of Inhaled Treprostinil for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
*Original Article*
# Abstract
## Background
Two phase 3, randomized trials of inhaled treprostinil for
idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) were conducted on the basis of preclinical
and clinical evidence of an antifibrotic mechanism. TETON-2 was completed first,
and results were published; the results of TETON-1 and of both trials combined
are reported here.
## Methods
In the double-blind TETON-1 trial, we randomly assigned patients with
IPF to receive inhaled treprostinil or placebo (12 breaths four times daily).
The primary end point was the change in forced vital capacity (FVC) at week 52.
Secondary end points, which were analyzed in a prespecified order to control for
multiplicity, were clinical worsening (the first occurrence of death from any
cause, hospitalization for a respiratory cause, or a relative decline of ā„10% in
the percentage of predicted FVC) and acute exacerbation of IPF (each assessed in
a time-to-event analysis), survival, change in percentage of predicted FVC,
quality of life, and change in diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon
monoxide at week 52.
## Results
A total of 598 patients underwent randomization and received at least
one dose of treprostinil (299 patients) or placebo (299 patients). Of these, 434
completed the assessments through week 52 (218 in the treprostinil group and 216
in the placebo group). The mean age of the patients was 73.0 years, 77.3% were
men, and 77.6% were receiving background antifibrotic therapy; the percentage of
predicted FVC at baseline was 74.6%. The median change in FVC at week 52 was
-43.3 ml (95% confidence interval [CI], -92.1 to -9.1) with treprostinil and
-196.2 ml (95% CI, -227.1 to -155.6) with placebo (difference, 130.1 ml; 95% CI,
82.2 to 178.1; P<0.001). Clinical worsening occurred in 95 patients (31.8%) with
treprostinil and in 133 patients (44.5%) with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95%
CI, 0.52 to 0.88; Pā=ā0.003). No significant difference was observed in the time
to an IPF exacerbation, and no further inferences regarding secondary end points
were made. The most frequent adverse event was cough (reported in 54.8% of the
patients in the treprostinil group and 33.1% patients in the placebo group).
Discontinuation of treprostinil or placebo occurred in 40.5% and 32.8% of the
patients, respectively, with adverse event being the primary reason (20.7% and
14.7%). Efficacy and safety outcomes were similar in analyses of the combined
trial data.
## Conclusions
In patients with IPF, treatment with inhaled treprostinil led to a
smaller decline in FVC and fewer clinical-worsening events than placebo over the
course of 52 weeks. (Funded by United Therapeutics; TETON-1 ClinicalTrials.gov
number, NCT04708782.).
---
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2501488