Zanidatamab with and without Tislelizumab in HER2-Positive Gastroesophageal
Summary
Zanidatamab with and without Tislelizumab in HER2-Positive Gastroesophageal Original Article Abstract Background Zanidatamab, a dual human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted bispecific antibody, plus chemotherapy both with and without tislelizumab (anti-programmed death 1), showed encouraging efficacy and safety as first-line therapy in phase 2 studies involving patients with HER2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Methods In an open-label, phase 3 trial, we rando
Content
# Zanidatamab with and without Tislelizumab in HER2-Positive Gastroesophageal
*Original Article*
# Abstract
## Background
Zanidatamab, a dual human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
(HER2)-targeted bispecific antibody, plus chemotherapy both with and without
tislelizumab (anti-programmed death 1), showed encouraging efficacy and safety
as first-line therapy in phase 2 studies involving patients with HER2-positive
gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.
## Methods
In an open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1
ratio, patients with previously untreated, centrally confirmed HER2-positive
advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma to receive zanidatamab and tislelizumab
plus chemotherapy, zanidatamab plus chemotherapy, or trastuzumab plus
chemotherapy. The two primary end points were progression-free survival and
overall survival.
## Results
At a median follow-up of 25.9 months, progression-free survival was
longer with zanidatamab-tislelizumab-chemotherapy (median among 302 patients,
12.4 months) and zanidatamab-chemotherapy (median among 304 patients, 12.4
months) than with trastuzumab-chemotherapy (median among 308 patients, 8.1
months) (hazard ratio for progression or death with
zanidatamab-tislelizumab-chemotherapy, 0.63 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.51
to 0.78]; hazard ratio with zanidatamab-chemotherapy, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.52 to
0.81]; P<0.001 for both comparisons). Overall survival was longer with
zanidatamab-tislelizumab-chemotherapy than with trastuzumab-chemotherapy
(median, 26.4 vs. 19.2 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57 to
0.90; Pā=ā0.004). At this interim analysis, overall survival did not differ
significantly between zanidatamab-chemotherapy (median, 24.4 months) and
trastuzumab-chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.01; Pā=ā0.06).
The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 83.3% with
zanidatamab-tislelizumab-chemotherapy, 73.8% with zanidatamab-chemotherapy, and
74.5% with trastuzumab-chemotherapy; diarrhea was the most common such event, in
24.8%, 20.0%, and 12.9% of patients, respectively.
## Conclusions
Zanidatamab plus chemotherapy, both with and without tislelizumab,
led to longer progression-free survival than trastuzumab plus chemotherapy among
patients with HER2-positive advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. At this
interim analysis, overall survival was longer with
zanidatamab-tislelizumab-chemotherapy than with trastuzumab-chemotherapy;
further analyses are planned to assess zanidatamab-chemotherapy. Diarrhea was a
common adverse event. (Funded by Jazz Pharmaceuticals and others; HERIZON-GEA-01
ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05152147.).
---
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2517729