Mavacamten in Adolescents with Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.
Summary
Mavacamten in Adolescents with Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Original Article Abstract Background Approved pharmacologic therapies for pediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are lacking, and surgical intervention may be indicated in patients with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. The efficacy and safety of mavacamten, a cardiac myosin inhibitor that is available for adults, warrant evaluation in adolescents. Methods We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, pla
Content
# Mavacamten in Adolescents with Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.
*Original Article*
# Abstract
## Background
Approved pharmacologic therapies for pediatric hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy are lacking, and surgical intervention may be indicated in
patients with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. The efficacy and
safety of mavacamten, a cardiac myosin inhibitor that is available for adults,
warrant evaluation in adolescents.
## Methods
We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled
trial involving symptomatic adolescents (12 to <18 years of age) with New York
Heart Association class II or III obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The
patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive mavacamten or placebo.
The primary end point was the change from baseline to week 28 in left
ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient provoked by the Valsalva maneuver.
## Results
A total of 44 patients underwent randomization; 23 patients (8 [35%] of
whom were female) were assigned to mavacamten group, and 21 (5 [24%] of whom
were female) were assigned to the placebo group. The mean (±SD) age of the
patients was 14.7±1.7 years in the mavacamten group and 14.6±1.7 years in the
placebo group, and the mean Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract gradient at
baseline was similar in the two groups (78.4±34.1 mm Hg and 80.8±47.4 mm Hg,
respectively). At week 28, the least-squares mean change in the Valsalva left
ventricular outflow tract gradient was -48.5 mm Hg in the mavacamten group and
-0.5 mm Hg in the placebo group (difference, -48.0 mm Hg; 95% confidence
interval, -67.7 to -28.3; P<0.001). The incidence of adverse events was similar
in the two groups. Two patients in each group had serious adverse events; in the
mavacamten group, 1 patient had two episodes of syncope, and another had an
inappropriate shock delivered by an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; in
the placebo group, 1 patient had chest pain, and another had depression with
suicidal ideation. No patient had a reduction in the left ventricular ejection
fraction to less than 50%. No deaths occurred during the trial.
## Conclusions
Among adolescent patients with obstructive hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy, the reduction in left ventricular outflow tract obstruction was
significantly greater with mavacamten than with placebo over a 28-week period.
(Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; SCOUT-HCM ClinicalTrials.gov number,
NCT06253221.).
---
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2601103