IVUS-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI in Unprotected Left Main Coronary
Summary
IVUS-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Original Article Abstract Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly used for revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Whether intravascular ultrasonographic (IVUS) guidance during PCI results in better clinical outcomes than conventional angiographic guidance alone is uncertain. Methods In an international, multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned pat
Content
# IVUS-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI in Unprotected Left Main Coronary
*Original Article*
# Abstract
## Background
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly used for
revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Whether
intravascular ultrasonographic (IVUS) guidance during PCI results in better
clinical outcomes than conventional angiographic guidance alone is uncertain.
## Methods
In an international, multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly
assigned patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease in a 1:1
ratio to undergo either IVUS-guided PCI or angiography-guided PCI. The primary
end point was a patient-oriented composite of any stroke, any myocardial
infarction, any revascularization, or death from any cause at the longest
follow-up.
## Results
A total of 806 patients underwent randomization; 401 were assigned to
undergo IVUS-guided PCI and 405 to undergo angiography-guided PCI. The mean
(±SD) age of the patients was 71.4±10.7 years, 78.4% of the patients were men,
and 34.7% had diabetes. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, a primary end-point
event had occurred in 135 patients (33.7%) in the IVUS-guided PCI group and in
125 patients (30.9%) in the angiography-guided PCI group (hazard ratio, 1.11;
95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.42; P = 0.40). The incidence of death,
myocardial infarction, or revascularization appeared to be similar in the two
groups. The percentages of patients with procedure-related and overall safety
events also appeared to be similar in the two groups.
## Conclusions
Among patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease,
IVUS-guided PCI showed no additional benefit over angiography-guided PCI with
respect to the incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, any
revascularization, or death from any cause at a median follow-up of 2.9 years.
(Funded by Philips Image Guided Therapy Devices and Boston Scientific; OPTIMAL
ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04111770.).
---
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2600440