JAMA

Medicare Spending Implications for Semaglutide Under Voluntary Price Agreements

27.4.2026 Source: JAMA

Summary

reported receiving grants from Blood Cancer United and the National Cancer Institute and being a member of the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review’s (ICER) Midwestern Comparative Effectiveness Advisory Council and receiving personal fees from ICER; additionally, Dr Dusetzina is a member of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC). Ms Castle reported having part-time employment with CivicaScript and previous employment with Trinity Life Sciences. Dr Han reported previous employmen

Content

# Medicare Spending Implications for Semaglutide Under Voluntary Price Agreements *Published: 2026 Apr 28* reported receiving grants from Blood Cancer United and the National Cancer Institute and being a member of the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review’s (ICER) Midwestern Comparative Effectiveness Advisory Council and receiving personal fees from ICER; additionally, Dr Dusetzina is a member of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC). Ms Castle reported having part-time employment with CivicaScript and previous employment with Trinity Life Sciences. Dr Han reported previous employment with GSK. No other disclosures were reported. 18. JAMA. 2026 Apr 28;335(16):1418-1427. doi: 10.1001/jama.2026.2197. Lead-Attributable Cardiovascular Disease Burden: Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. GBD 2023 Lead Collaborators; Stanaway JD(1), Spearman S(1), DeCleene NK(1), Garcia V(1), Lara-Castor L(1), Lim SS(1), Murray CJL(1), Roth GA(1), Seymour MA(1), Stark B(1), Brauer M(1). Author information: (1)Department of Health Metrics Sciences, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington. Comment in JAMA. 2026 Apr 28;335(16):1396-1398. doi: 10.1001/jama.2026.3041. ## IMPORTANCE Despite declines, lead exposure remains a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. Quantifying the direct effects of cumulative bone lead exposure on CVD is essential to guide prevention and policy. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the association between bone lead levels and CVD, derive an exposure-response curve, and estimate global, regional, and national lead-attributable disease burden for 1990 to 2023. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Analysis of 42 028 adults from 9 cycles of the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning 1988 through 2013, with follow-up through December 2015 capturing 1748 CVD deaths, was combined with a systematic review and meta-regression. Bone lead was estimated from blood lead, age, and cohort-specific exposure histories. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for blood pressure and confounders estimated hazard ratios for CVD mortality. A bayesian meta-regression using the Burden of Proof framework pooled NHANES results with published data to estimate the risk curve, which was then applied to lead exposure and CVD estimates to estimate population-attributable fractions and lead-attributable CVD burden. EXPOSURE: Estimated bone lead levels. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Lead-attributable CVD mortality, years lived with disability, years of life lost, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) by age, sex, year, and location. ## RESULTS NHANES participants were aged 18 to 90 years (median, 46 [IQR, 32-63] years) and 51.5% of participants were female, with estimated bone lead levels ranging from 0.17 μg/g to 301 μg/g (median, 13.3 μg/g). Higher bone lead levels were associated with higher CVD risk: relative to estimated preindustrial levels of 0.027 μg/g, bone lead levels of 5 μg/g, 10 μg/g, 25 μg/g, 50 μg/g, and 100 μg/g corresponded to 7.5% (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 1.7%-14.1%), 15.8% (95% UI, 12.7%-19.1%), 41.3% (95% UI, 34.2%-49.2%), 71.3% (95% UI, 55.4%-90.0%), and 87.9% (95% UI, 61.0%-121.2%) greater CVD mortality risk, respectively. Globally in 2023, 3.5 million (95% UI, 2.6 million to 4.4 million) deaths and 71.6 million (95% UI, 52.4 million to 90.3 million) DALYs were attributable to lead exposure, accounting for 5.8% (95% UI, 4.3%-7.2%) of all deaths and 2.6% (95% UI, 1.8%-3.2%) of all DALYs. Lead was the eighth leading risk for global mortality and second leading environmental risk. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Cumulative lead exposure remains a major, preventable contributor to global CVD mortality. Strengthened surveillance, regulation, and remediation are urgently required to reduce the lead-attributable burden. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2026.2197 PMCID: PMC13036637 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2026.2615