Real-world clinical utility of tumor whole-genome sequencing in solid cancers
Summary
Molecular testing is essential in precision oncology. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides a tumor-agnostic solution for detecting an increasingly complex range of DNA-based biomarkers. Here we present real-world data from 888 patients to demonstrate the clinical utility of routine, paired tumor-normal WGS diagnostics for solid cancers in a comprehensive cancer center. WGS succeeded in 89% of cases with a median turnaround time of 6 working days. Potentially actionable biomarkers were id
Content
# Real-world clinical utility of tumor whole-genome sequencing in solid cancers
*Published: 2026 Apr*
Molecular testing is essential in precision oncology. Whole-genome sequencing
(WGS) provides a tumor-agnostic solution for detecting an increasingly complex
range of DNA-based biomarkers. Here we present real-world data from 888 patients
to demonstrate the clinical utility of routine, paired tumor-normal WGS
diagnostics for solid cancers in a comprehensive cancer center. WGS succeeded in
89% of cases with a median turnaround time of 6 working days. Potentially
actionable biomarkers were identified in 73% of patients, including biomarkers
for reimbursed (27%) and experimental (63%) therapies. Within 1 year, 40% and
19% of patients, respectively, started biomarker-informed treatment, which was
associated with a 31% longer median overall survival (+96 days) compared with
patients not receiving such therapy. Among patients without prior systemic
therapy, biomarker-informed treatment yielded significantly longer overall
survival (median not reached) than non-biomarker-informed therapy (427 days) or
no systemic therapy (214 days). In cancers of unknown primary (n = 123), WGS
contributed to diagnostic solution or detected biomarker-driven reimbursed
treatment options in 67%, with 68% starting tumor-type-specific therapy.
Clinically relevant pathogenic germline variants were identified in 6.5% of
patients. Overall, WGS-based diagnostics had clinical consequences for 41% of
tested patients, providing a versatile tool for routine clinical practice in
solid oncology.
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-026-04280-2