Targeted therapies plus radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: the randomized phase 2 BIOMEDE trial
Summary
Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is the pediatric tumor with the worst prognosis. BIOMEDE was a randomized phase 2 trial comparing the efficacy in terms of overall survival (OS) (primary endpoint) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib, mTOR inhibitor everolimus and multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib in combination with radiotherapy in patients with a biopsy-proven DIPG. Tumors were assessed centrally for immunohistochemical biomarkers (EGFR ov
Content
# Targeted therapies plus radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: the randomized phase 2 BIOMEDE trial
*Published: 2026 Apr 24*
Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is the pediatric tumor with the worst
prognosis. BIOMEDE was a randomized phase 2 trial comparing the efficacy in
terms of overall survival (OS) (primary endpoint) of epidermal growth factor
receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib, mTOR inhibitor everolimus and multitargeted
tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib in combination with radiotherapy in patients
with a biopsy-proven DIPG. Tumors were assessed centrally for
immunohistochemical biomarkers (EGFR overexpression or PTEN loss) together with
whole-exome and RNA sequencing. A cohort of 66 children with the same inclusion
criteria and treated previously with temozolomide-based regimen was used to
compare outcome. Treatment allocation was performed by randomization in 233
patients, designed so that a drug could not be allocated if the corresponding
biomarker was absent: 36 received erlotinib, 102 received dasatinib and 95
received everolimus. The trial was ended for futility of the primary endpoint
following the recommendations of the independent data monitoring committee: OS
from biopsy was not different from the control cohort (median OS = 10.8 months
(95% confidence interval (CI): 9.5-13.0)) in any of the three arms (median
OS = 9.7 months (95% CI: 7.8-14.6) for erlotinib; 9.9 months (95% CI: 8.8-11.2)
for dasatinib; and 11.9 months (95% CI: 10.7-14.2) for everolimus). Everolimus
showed significantly less ocular, renal, skin and gastrointestinal side effects
and treatment discontinuation for toxicity (secondary endpoint). TP53 mutations,
frequently linked to multiple structural chromosomal aberrations, were the
strongest predictor for poor survival in multivariate analysis (hazard
ratio = 2.8 (95% CI: 1.9-4.2), P < 0.0001). Both mutations in and activation of
the mTOR pathway were associated with a better response to everolimus. Four
long-term survivors treated with an mTOR inhibitor were alive free of treatment
over 6 years from diagnosis. With comprehensive tumor profiling, BIOMEDE
validated prognostic biomarkers as well as informative theranostic biomarkers
for future trials. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02233049 .
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-026-04354-1