Dynamics of natural selection preceding human viral epidemics and pandemics
Summary
bioRxiv. 2025 Feb 28:2025.02.26.640439. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.26.640439. Using a phylogenetic framework to characterize natural selection, we investigate the hypothesis that zoonotic viruses require adaptation prior to zoonosis to sustain human-to-human transmission. Examining the zoonotic emergence of Ebola virus, Marburg virus, mpox virus, influenza A virus, and SARS-CoV-2, we find no evidence of a change in selection intensity immediately prior to outbreaks in humans compared with typical
Content
# Dynamics of natural selection preceding human viral epidemics and pandemics
*Published: 2026 Apr 30*
bioRxiv. 2025 Feb 28:2025.02.26.640439. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.26.640439.
Using a phylogenetic framework to characterize natural selection, we investigate
the hypothesis that zoonotic viruses require adaptation prior to zoonosis to
sustain human-to-human transmission. Examining the zoonotic emergence of Ebola
virus, Marburg virus, mpox virus, influenza A virus, and SARS-CoV-2, we find no
evidence of a change in selection intensity immediately prior to outbreaks in
humans compared with typical selection within reservoir hosts. We found a change
in selection on SARS-CoV in an intermediate host. We conclude that extensive
pre-zoonotic adaptation is not necessary for human-to-human transmission of
zoonotic viruses. In contrast, the reemergence of H1N1 influenza A virus in 1977
was preceded by a shift in selection intensity, consistent with the hypothesis
of passage in a laboratory setting. Holistic phylogenetic analysis of selection
regimes can be used to detect evolutionary signals of host switching or
laboratory passage, providing insight into the circumstances of past and future
viral emergence.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2026.02.006